<?xml version="1.0" encoding="ISO-8859-1"?>

<rdf:RDF
 xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
 xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/"
 xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/"
 xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
 xmlns:syn="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
 xmlns:prism="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/prism/"
 xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
>

<channel rdf:about="http://dtb.bmj.com">
<title>Drug and Therapeutics Bulletin current issue</title>
<link>http://dtb.bmj.com</link>
<description>Drug and Therapeutics Bulletin RSS feed -- current issue</description>
<prism:coverDisplayDate>August 2008</prism:coverDisplayDate>
<prism:publicationName>Drug and Therapeutics Bulletin</prism:publicationName>
<prism:issn>0012-6543</prism:issn>
<items>
 <rdf:Seq>
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dtb.bmj.com/cgi/content/full/46/8/57?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dtb.bmj.com/cgi/content/full/46/8/62?rss=1" />
  <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://dtb.bmj.com/cgi/reprint/46/8/64?rss=1" />
 </rdf:Seq>
</items>
<image rdf:resource="http://www.dtb.bmj.com/icons/banner/title.gif" />
</channel>

<image rdf:about="http://www.dtb.bmj.com/icons/banner/title.gif">
<title>Drug and Therapeutics Bulletin</title>
<url>http://www.dtb.bmj.com/icons/banner/title.gif</url>
<link>http://dtb.bmj.com</link>
</image>

<item rdf:about="http://dtb.bmj.com/cgi/content/full/46/8/57?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Rituximab and {blacktriangledown}abatacept for rheumatoid arthritis]]></title>
<link>http://dtb.bmj.com/cgi/content/full/46/8/57?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Estimates from the UK indicate that around 0.5&ndash;1.0% of the population have rheumatoid arthritis.1 Here we assess the place of rituximab (MabThera &ndash; Roche Products Ltd) and abatacept (Orencia &ndash; Bristol-Myers-Squibb), drugs in two new classes, which are licensed for certain adults with the condition.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-08-06</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/dtb.2008.07.0017</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Rituximab and {blacktriangledown}abatacept for rheumatoid arthritis]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>8</prism:number>
<prism:volume>46</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>61</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>57</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://dtb.bmj.com/cgi/content/full/46/8/62?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[What role for {blacktriangledown}tigecycline in infections?]]></title>
<link>http://dtb.bmj.com/cgi/content/full/46/8/62?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Tigecycline (pronounced tie-ge-<I>sigh</I>-cleen; Tygacil &ndash; Wyeth) is a broad-spectrum antibacterial and the first glycylcycline to be marketed in the UK. It is active against certain resistant bacteria, including meticillin-resistant <I>Staphylococcus aureus</I> (MRSA) and bacteria that produce extended-spectrum &beta;-lactamase (ESBL).<cross-ref type="bib" refid="b1">1</cross-ref>, <cross-ref type="bib" refid="b2">2</cross-ref> Tigecycline is licensed for intravenous treatment of adults with complicated skin and soft tissue infections, and complicated intra-abdominal infections.<cross-ref type="bib" refid="b1">1</cross-ref> We review tigecycline and assess its place for these infections.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-08-06</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/dtb.2008.07.0018</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[What role for {blacktriangledown}tigecycline in infections?]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>8</prism:number>
<prism:volume>46</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>64</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>62</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Articles</prism:section>
</item>

<item rdf:about="http://dtb.bmj.com/cgi/reprint/46/8/64?rss=1">
<title><![CDATA[Correction: surgery for obesity in adults]]></title>
<link>http://dtb.bmj.com/cgi/reprint/46/8/64?rss=1</link>
<description><![CDATA[
<p>Our review on <I>Surgery for obesity in adults</I> (<I>DTB</I> 2008; 46: 41&ndash;5) incorrectly suggested that, in relation to advice from the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE), "PCTs are obliged to provide funding to patients who meet the [NICE] criteria for surgery". In fact, the criteria referred to appear in a current NICE clinical guideline (CG) and, as a result, funding of provision is not mandatory. This is different from recommendations that appear in NICE technology appraisal guidance (TAG), which are usually mandatory within 3 months. This error does not affect our article&rsquo;s <I>Conclusion</I>.</p>
]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[]]></dc:creator>
<dc:date>2008-08-06</dc:date>
<dc:identifier>info:doi/10.1136/dtb.2008.07.0019</dc:identifier>
<dc:title><![CDATA[Correction: surgery for obesity in adults]]></dc:title>
<dc:publisher>British Medical Journal Publishing Group</dc:publisher>
<prism:number>8</prism:number>
<prism:volume>46</prism:volume>
<prism:endingPage>64</prism:endingPage>
<prism:publicationDate>2008-08-01</prism:publicationDate>
<prism:startingPage>64</prism:startingPage>
<prism:section>Articles</prism:section>
</item>

</rdf:RDF>