Drug and Therapeutics Bulletin 2006;44:73-77; doi:10.1136/dtb.2006.441073
Copyright © 2006 by the BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.

This Article
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Submit a response
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me when eLetters are posted
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this link to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in PubMed
Right arrow Add article to my folders
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Search for Related Content
PubMed
Right arrow PubMed Citation

New drugs from old

The NHS spends over £10 billion each year on medicines.1 The use of generic (patent-expired) medicines rather than branded equivalents has a key role in containing this expenditure and ensuring best value for money. On average, 4 years after the patent of a branded medicine has expired in the UK, generic equivalents will account for around half of the drug's market and cost about a quarter as much as the original brand.1,2 This represents a potentially large loss of income and, therefore, a major concern for companies that market branded products.3 Consequently, many use a long-term strategy known as 'lifecycle management' to minimise loss and to maximise returns from such products.2,4 This encompasses prioritising products for development, forming strategic alliances with other companies to share resourses, and utilising legal processes to protect products. One part of this strategy is the development and intensive marketing of new formulations or derivatives of existing medicines nearing the end of their patent life. Here we highlight some key examples of the impact the marketing of such products can have on patients, prescribers and the NHS.






About DTB - Privacy policy - Terms and conditions relating to subscriptions purchased online - Web site terms and conditions - Feedback

© 2006 BMJ Publishing Group Ltd.